http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/indian-voters-only-short-term-solution-against-islamic-terror-zero-tolerance-of-politicians-media-and-academics/ Just another WordPress.com weblog Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:07:02 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/indian-voters-only-short-term-solution-against-islamic-terror-zero-tolerance-of-politicians-media-and-academics/#comment-622 SR Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:48:30 +0000 http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/?p=669#comment-622 Today I discovered a soul mate...thanks for writing ...you are in my favorites and I'll read your blog like I read the National Review day in and day out... Today I discovered a soul mate…thanks for
writing …you are in my favorites and I’ll read your blog like I read the National Review day in and day out…

]]> http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/indian-voters-only-short-term-solution-against-islamic-terror-zero-tolerance-of-politicians-media-and-academics/#comment-620 dikgaj Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:57:15 +0000 http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/?p=669#comment-620 It is true definitely as one of the factors - the British faced a lot of armed uprisings from various Hindu groups and they tool special draconian measures to ensure that the subkect populations did not have access to weapons or maintain their martial traditions. Even then the final straw that broke the British back and contributed to its decision to hand over power was (1) the INA march towards Imphal and the huge popularity of the imprisoned INA officers (2) the Naval uprising which could only be suppressed by false promises of the Nehruvian citerie. The strongest opposition to Nehru's power came from the two "armed revolutionary" provinces of Punjab and Bengal which were partitioned by the British so that these populations were displaced and destroyed. Nehruvian government therefore continued the British policy of leaving the populations without any means of self-defence as they were more concerned about holding onto power themselves which could be jeopardized. It is true definitely as one of the factors – the British faced a lot of armed uprisings from various Hindu groups and they tool special draconian measures to ensure that the subkect populations did not have access to weapons or maintain their martial traditions. Even then the final straw that broke the British back and contributed to its decision to hand over power was (1) the INA march towards Imphal and the huge popularity of the imprisoned INA officers (2) the Naval uprising which could only be suppressed by false promises of the Nehruvian citerie. The strongest opposition to Nehru’s power came from the two “armed revolutionary” provinces of Punjab and Bengal which were partitioned by the British so that these populations were displaced and destroyed. Nehruvian government therefore continued the British policy of leaving the populations without any means of self-defence as they were more concerned about holding onto power themselves which could be jeopardized.

]]> http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/2008/11/29/indian-voters-only-short-term-solution-against-islamic-terror-zero-tolerance-of-politicians-media-and-academics/#comment-619 Jim Ostrowski Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:49:22 +0000 http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/?p=669#comment-619 Some of us are wondering about whether strict gun laws played a role. Some of us are wondering about whether strict gun laws played a role.

]]>